PSY 310 Topic 2 The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Justice
The comity of Forensic Psychology and Criminology
Forensic psychology and criminology have parallels yet numerous differences when looking at the fields, places, and limits in these studies. Forensic psychology involves studying the opinion of culprits and how it threatens society (Gbadebo- Goyea et al., 2012). Criminology examines the impact of crime on society and how crime can be reduced (Eskridge, 2005). These two statements about each field differ, but they do intermediate in the felonious justice field and have comity with each other.
Diagnosing culprits as stable or insane and examining how society hovers, how felonious conduct impacts society, and the significance of reduction with a crime are each important aspects in the felonious justice field. Throughout this paper, the differences between the field of forensic psychology and criminology will be examined. Another important that will be bandied is the different places and their legal, ethical, and clinical limitations that forensic psychologists have the felonious justice.
Differences Between Fields
PSY 310 Topic 2 The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Justice
When looking at forensic psychology and criminology, there are numerous differences between these two fields, indeed though they’re both involved with the felonious justice field. Forensic psychology focuses on the relationship between our justice system and internal health assessment (Ludici, 2015). Forensic psychology differs from criminology since it examines the felonious mind and the personality factors that the felonious presents (Gbadebo- Goyea al.).
Studying felonious gests and the threat of it repeating, a neurobiological corridor of psychopathic personalities and how it threatens society is another important exploration part of forensic psychology (Gbadebo- Goyea et al., 2012). Criminology is a field that focuses on minimizing the impact crime has and reducing the quantum of impact crime has on society (Eskridge, 2005). Genetics, biology, sociology, psychology, and economics cross with individual development, and the crime movement being taken towards or down are each important aspect that is also piecemeal of criminology (Eskridge, 2005).
Defining Places
PSY 310 Topic 2 The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Justice
Forensic psychologists have multiple places in the felonious justice system. The experimenter part for a forensic psychologist involves studying felonious history, examining suspects and victims, recording information from the viewer, and taking data and using it for expert use (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2021). A counselor part for a forensic psychologist focuses on the understanding of crime, discipline, and ramifications of the justice system; this part is generally appertained to as a corrective counselor (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2021).
Forensic psychologists trained in frequently comforting test and assess the internal state of the felonious and determine what conduct should be done (Gbadebo- Goyea et al., 2012). One other veritably important part a forensic psychologist plays in the felonious justice system is as an adviser. Advisers can be involved in the court system or law enforcement, but these places differ and specialize in different corridors of the felonious justice system (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2021).
PSY 310 Topic 2 The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Justice
Jury advisers deal with substantiation evidence, give sapience to attorneys, explore jurors involved in questioning the executing and defense attorneys, and provide cerebral sapience to the court system (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology). Police advisers, on the other hand, concentrate on educating police officers on ways to handle situations pertaining to cerebral understanding, advance community policing strategies, or particular struggles passing in the department (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2021). Though both of these adviser places differ, they do connect the cerebral aspects of crime to the felonious justice system.
Legal, Ethical, and Clinical Limits
Forensic psychologists have legal, ethical, and clinical limitations for the three places explained in the former section. An experimenter can come across the ethical limitation known as bias. Forensic psychologists need to be neutral, conscientious, active, and ideal, and bias can get in the way of making sure to follow the ethical law (Bartol & Bartol, 2019). A legal limitation that experimenters encounter is falsification, which can beget detrimental to cases on the trials and trust in the validity of the trial, which can make people question the forensic psychologist experimenter’s character (George, 2016).
The legal and clinical limitations are fairly analogous and involve the credibility of exploration. For the part of a counselor, confidentiality is an ethical and legal limitation that could define the relationship, qualifications, and services between the customer and counselor (Hugaboom, 2002). The clinical limitation for counselors is informed concurrence which means that the counselor has to educate the customer on treatment details (Hugaboom, 2002).
PSY 310 Topic 2 The Role of Forensic Psychology in Criminal Justice
For advisers, having multiple connections and being a part of further than one part with one person impacts capability and performance (Behnke). The legal limitation for advisers is record keeping, which has guidelines and conditions to make opinions about professional records (American Psychological Association, 2007). The clinical limitation for consults and consultations from forensic psychologists is a collaboration that’s professionals in order to reduce bias and profit from the case (Clayton & Bongar, 1994).
Conclusion
Forensic psychology and criminology differ in what each field studies since forensic psychology involves studying and diagnosing culprits and how the results hang society (Gbadebo- Goyea et al., 2012). While criminology looks at the impact crime has on society and how crime can be reduced (Eskridge, 2005). The places of forensic psychology examined in this essay showed how there are multiple ways a forensic psychologist plays a part in the felonious justice system. Experimenters, advisers, and counselors are places that connect the cerebral aspects with the legal system (The Chicago School of Professional Psychology). Those places have ethical, legal, and clinical limitations that range from bias and character to confidentiality and informed concurrence. Overall, forensic psychology has multiple aspects that are a part of the felonious justice field, and although it differs from criminology, this field does unite with criminology.
References
Eskridge,C.W.( 2005). The State of the Field of Criminology Detailed Essay. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY Felonious JUSTICE, 21( 4), 296- 308.
https//search-ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN179868440&site=eds-live&scope=site.
Gbadebo- Goyea, E.A., Akpudo, H., Jackson, C.D., Wassef, T., Barker, N.C., Cunningham Burley, R., Ali, S.A., Jabeen, S., & Bailey, R.K.( 2012).
Collaboration The Paradigm of Practice Approach between the Forensic Psychiatrist and the Forensic Psychologist. Borders in psychiatry, 3, 89.
https//doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00089
Ludici,A., Salvini,A., Faccio,E., & Castelnuovo,G.( 2015). The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Moxie. Borders in psychology, Vol. 6, 1831.
https//doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01831
The Chicago School.( 2021). Twelve different career paths with a forensic psychology master’s degree.
https//www.thechicagoschool.edu/insight/careerdevelopment/career-options-masters-degree-forensic-psychology/
Behnke,S.( 2004). Ethics Rounds– Multiple connections and APA’s new Ethics Code Values and operations.
https//www.apa.org/monitor/jan04/ethics
Clayton, S., & Bongar, B.( 1994). The Use of Consultation in Cerebral Practice Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Considerations. Ethics & Behavior, 4( 1), 43.
https//doi.org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0401_3
American Psychological Association. ( 2007). Record keeping guidelines.
https//www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/record-keeping
Bartol,C.R., & Bartol,A.M.( 2019). preface to forensic psychology( 5th ed.). Savant. ISBN- 13978150638 7246.
https//www.gcumedia.com/digital/resources/sage/2018/introduction-to-forensicpsychology_research-and_application_5e.php
Hugaboom,D.( 2002). The Different Duties and Liabilities of Clinical and Forensic Psychologists in Legal Proceedings. The Review A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research, 5( 4), 27- 32.
https//fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1121&context=ur
