NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 4 Risk Mitigation

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 4 Risk Mitigation

Risk Management Plan

Risk identified by SAFER Guides

Possibility of Occurrence (Frequent, Sometimes, Never)

Potential for Harm (Severe, Mild, None)

Mitigation to Address Risks

Data loss due to low resilience of software



Need for a robust contingency plan 

Poor IT infrastructure



Invest in the infrastructure to upgrade the technology (Rhoades et al., 2022).

Low clinical workflow



Enhance staff productivity through training (DiAngi et al., 2019).

Misrepresentation of patient data 



Integrate a reliable patient identification system (Riplinger et al., 2020)

Poor communication among staff



Use novel communication channels to reduce the communication barriers 

Electronic Health Data Leakage 



Multifactor authentication to access the patient data (Bahache et al., 2022).

Ethical or Legal Issues Related to Identified Risks

Information about patients being distorted can have serious ethical and legal repercussions. Potential issues could be security infringement, as the patient’s more right than wrong to protection might be disregarded on the off chance that information about them is distorted in the medical services industry. Patients reserve an option to expect that any information about them that is private or clinical will be kept hidden and not unveiled without their consent (Balynska et al., 2021). This classification can be disregarded by distorting the information that imperils the patient’s protection.

The irregularity in the information might prompt clinical negligence in the medical services organization. Moreover, giving misleading information about a patient because of low consistency with software may likewise comprise clinical misbehavior. Regulation and morality require medical care professionals to give their patients exact and honest information. The attendants’ implicit set of rules underlines giving consideration to administrations by complying with ethical standards (Ilkafah et al., 2021). Poor correspondence between the medical services staff prompts wrong analysis and improper course of therapy that imperils the patient. Professional unfortunate behavior additionally diminishes the clinical outpouring and hampers the outcome of medical care organizations.

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 4 Risk Mitigation

While cooperating with patients, medical care professionals are answerable for acting genuinely and with honesty. A break of this obligation that outcomes in disciplinary activity is the spillage of patient information. Abusing patient information gives the patient the option to make a legal move. Patients who experience hurt because of the infringement of Safeguarded Wellbeing Information (PHI) might be qualified for remuneration for their torment, clinical expense, and different harms. Medical services professionals might confront serious ethical and legal repercussions assuming they purposefully abuse the protection law of patient information (Choi et al., 2019). To ensure that patients get the right consideration and to forestall any expected legal or ethical issues, medical care suppliers should safeguard patients’ exact and honest information in medical services settings.

The possible adverse consequences of not addressing the risks inside a wellbeing organization lead to a few issues, like poor-quality patient consideration, monetary precariousness, and low staff morale. Patients’ security might be compromised because of medicine errors which lead to poor patient results. A patient might make legal moves that hurt a medical care organization’s standing. HIPAA infringement is one consistency risk that ought to be addressed promptly to stay away from punishments, claims, and reputational hurt. Risks to medical services organizations can likewise influence their monetary performance, as neglecting to address functional risks like ineffectual staffing can bring about greater expenses. Consequently addressing well-being organization risks is fundamental to guaranteeing the security of patients and staff, keeping up with consistency with guidelines, and accomplishing monetary solidness. Wellbeing organizations must proactively recognize and alleviate risks to forestall unfortunate results and accomplish their central goal of giving excellent patient consideration.

Justification of Actions to Address Identified Risks

Overhauled EHR frameworks can smooth out medical care processes, expanding the effectiveness and bringing down costs through automated processes, decreasing paperwork, and forestalling errors. Enhancements to EHR frameworks can give medical care professionals ongoing, information-driven bits of knowledge that can assist them with settling on better choices and working on understanding results (Rhoades et al., 2022). Staff individuals can save time and focus on more troublesome assignments by smoothing out workflows through compelling preparation for EHR use in medical care settings (Nuamah et al., 2020). Staff individuals should get prepared for powerful EHR use. This involves knowing how to enter and recover information and the framework’s highlights and works. Consistent directions and help can assist with setting up individuals to feel calm with the framework and use it effectively.

Clinical records can be made precise and current with the assistance of a patient-distinguishing proof framework. By utilizing a remarkable patient identifier, medical services professionals can forestall copying records or joining information from different patients, which can bring about errors and disarray. To convey protected and powerful consideration along with support clinical direction, exact information is fundamental (Riplinger et al., 2020)

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 4 Risk Mitigation

Multifactor verification (MFA) safeguards patient information under HIPAA rules and guidelines. Medical services suppliers are expected by HIPAA rules and guidelines to protect patients’ very own well-being information (PHI) from unauthorized access or divulgence. Executing multifactor confirmation is one method for working on the security of patient information. MFA is a safety effort that requests that authorized clients utilize a password or PIN to get to patient wellbeing records. Medical care suppliers can work on the security of patient information and lower the gamble of information breaks and unauthorized Safeguarded Wellbeing Information by carrying out MFA (Bahache et al., 2022).

Change Management Strategies

A different and talented group is crucial to carry out change in medical services organizations. Monetary and material assets assume a key part in rolling out an improvement. A medical services organization’s capacity to oversee change successfully guarantees that it embraces new methods, strategies, and guidelines that can improve patient results by bringing down stand-by times, upgrading care coordination, and increasing the expectation of care (Milella et al., 2021). Change management can bring about cost reserve funds by expanding the viability and productivity of medical care processes, cutting waste, and better using assets. It likewise guarantees consistency with advancing organizational standards and strategies is kept up with.

The Lewin model of change is a well-known framework for overseeing organizational change in medical care settings. The model comprises of three phases: thawing, changing, and refreezing (Harrison et al., 2021). The poor IT framework and low software consistency implied the change with the goal that EHR frameworks work actually to keep up with the consistency of patient information in data sets. Viable correspondence and collaboration among the partners are important to get positive change in the medical services organization. It works on quiet results and increases the expectation of care as medical services professionals utilize the Lewin model to design, do, and survey changes inside their organizations.

ADKAR (Mindfulness, Want, Information, Capacity, and Reinforcement) model oversees changes and accomplishes successes (Balluck et al., 2020). Medical care organizations should make sense of the change’s justification and the way that it will help patients, workers, and the organization. Medical services organizations should pressure the benefits of the change to staff to win their support. Medical services organizations should inform their staff about impending methods, foundations, or innovation changes. Staff should get preparing, training, or mentoring to execute the change. The last step is reinforcing the change by watching out for it, giving input, and compensating staff who have worked effectively carrying out it.

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 4 Risk Mitigation

The Allen Medical Clinic showed blemishes in its EHR management because of low staff preparation and poor IT framework. So utilizing the change referenced above management strategies will work on quiet results, staff fulfillment, and organizational performance at last. The change will likewise upgrade the collaboration between the partners, who work for a common vision. The partner focused on increasing the consideration expectation by going to powerful lengths to handle the identified risks in the organization.


Bahache, A. N., Chikouche, N., & Mezrag, F. (2022). Authentication schemes for healthcare applications using wireless medical sensor networks: A survey. SN Computer Science, 3(5).

Balluck, J., Asturi, E., & Brockman, V. (2020). Use of the ADKAR and CLARC change models to navigate staffing model changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurse Leader, 18(6).

Balynska, O., Teremetskyi, V., Zharovska, I., Shchyrba, M., & Novytska, N. (2021). Patient’s right to privacy in the health care sector. Georgian Medical News, 321, 147–153.

Choi, S. J., Johnson, M. E., & Lehmann, C. U. (2019). Data breach remediation efforts and their implications for hospital quality. Health Services Research, 54(5), 971–980.

DiAngi, Y. T., Stevens, L. A., Halpern – Felsher, B., Pageler, N. M., & Lee, T. C. (2019). Electronic health record (EHR) training program identifies a new tool to quantify the EHR time burden and improves providers’ perceived control over their workload in the EHR. JAMIA Open, 2(2), 222–230.

Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where do models for change management, improvement and implementation meet? A systematic review of the applications of change management models in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13(13), 85–108. NCBI.

Ilkafah, I., Mei Tyas, A. P., & Haryanto, J. (2021). Factors related to the implementation of nursing care ethical principles in Indonesia. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(2).

Milella, F., Minelli, E. A., Strozzi, F., & Croce, D. (2021). Change and innovation in healthcare: Findings from literature. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 13, 395–408.

Nuamah, J. K., Adapa, K., & Mazur, L. (2020). Electronic health records (EHR) simulation-based training: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open, 10(8), e036884.

Rhoades, C. A., Whitacre, B. E., & Davis, A. F. (2022). Higher electronic health record functionality is associated with lower operating costs in urban—but not rural—hospitals. Applied Clinical Informatics, 13(3), 665–676.

Riplinger, L., Piera-Jiménez, J., & Dooling, J. P. (2020). Patient identification techniques – approaches, implications, and findings. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 81–86.

Struggling With Your Paper?
Get in Touch