NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

As healthcare keeps on embracing technological advancements, healthcare professionals should completely understand the potential risks of carrying out these innovations. This is especially critical for Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) attendants who may end up leading large-scale informatics implementation projects. Distinguishing and mitigating potential risks is critical to guaranteeing the safety and uprightness of patient data in healthcare settings (Scantlebury et al., 2021).

We will examine the utilization of these guides to evaluate the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR) framework as an answer for addressing safety, cycle, or quality issues in a picked healthcare setting, i.e., Allen Hospital (Aguirre et al., 2019). The findings from this evaluation will educate the improvement regarding a gamble mitigation plan in a later assessment. Utilizing the SAFER guides, DNP medical caretakers can thoroughly understand the potential risks of executing informatics arrangements in healthcare (Flaubert et al., 2021). This information is critical for guaranteeing patient safety and data trustworthiness and for the progress of informatics implementation projects. This paper will investigate utilizing the SAFER guides to distinguish performance and chance issues in healthcare settings.

EHR as a Practice Change to Drive Improvements

An electronic health record (EHR) is a proposed informatics arrangement carried out as part of a practice change to drive improvements in the picked healthcare climate (Tsai et al., 2020). The EHR framework will replace the paper-based record-keeping framework with a digital platform enabling healthcare suppliers to access patient information from a centralized location. The EHR framework will capture and store patient information, for example, medical history, diagnoses, medications, allergies, laboratory test results, and radiology reports.

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

The primary goal of executing an EHR framework is to work on patient care and results by furnishing healthcare suppliers with easy access to accurate, state-of-the-art patient information (Adane et al., 2019). This will assist with guaranteeing that healthcare suppliers can make all around informed choices about patient care, decreasing the probability of mistakes and working on patient safety. Additionally, the EHR framework will streamline administrative cycles, for example, charging and planning, decreasing the time and assets expected for these tasks. Other improvement goals incorporate increasing productivity, lessening costs, enhancing communication, and working on patient satisfaction.

SAFER Guide Findings Related to Good Performance

The SAFER Guides evaluation of Allen Hospital’s EHR implementation has distinguished several areas where the hospital performs well. One of the areas where Allen Hospital is performing great is in the Hardware and Software Dependability domain. The hospital has executed hearty hardware, and software frameworks that are dependable, stable, and secure, which assists with guaranteeing that patient data is safeguarded and available when required (Szarfman et al., 2022). The hospital has also executed several measures to guarantee the reliability of hardware and software frameworks, like regular framework backups and failover frameworks.

Another area where Allen Hospital is performing great is in the Possibility Planning domain. The hospital has established powerful emergency courses of action to guarantee that patient data is secured and available during a disaster or framework failure (Melnychuk et al., 2022). The hospital has also established strategies for regular data backups and recuperation to guarantee that patient data isn’t lost during a framework failure (Melnychuk et al., 2022).

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

In addition, the hospital is performing great in the Clinical Cycle Improvement domain. The hospital has carried out several measures to work on clinical cycles, for example, utilizing clinical choice help tools and integrating clinical guidelines into the EHR framework (Enticott et al., 2021). This has worked on the quality of patient care, diminish mistakes, and work on patient results.


For example, during the SAFER Guides evaluation, it was found that Allen Hospital has executed several measures to guarantee that the EHR framework is dependable and secure. For instance, the hospital has carried out a powerful backup framework, guaranteeing that patient data is backed up regularly and available in case of a framework failure. The hospital has also executed a failover framework that guarantees that the EHR framework remains available in case of a hardware or software failure. Besides, the hospital has executed clinical choice help tools, for example, alerts and updates, which have further developed patient care quality. For instance, the EHR framework alerts clinicians when patients are expected for preventive administrations, for example, cancer screenings and immunizations, which has assisted with working on patient results (Huffstetler et al., 2022).

SAFER Guide Findings related to risks

Based on the SAFER Guides evaluation of Allen Hospital’s proposed implementation of an EHR, several risks were distinguished that might actually impact the task’s prosperity. These risks are categorized under various SAFER parts, including Hardware and Software Versatility, Possibility Planning, Framework Interfaces, Patient Identification, Clinical Work process, and Communications. The following are examples of explicit risks distinguished in each of these parts.


The SAFER Guides used to evaluate the proposed Electronic Health Record (EHR) framework at Allen Hospital featured several risks that should be addressed for fruitful implementation. The primary area of concern distinguished by the SAFER Guides was the hospital’s IT infrastructure’s ability to help the new EHR framework, which could lead to framework personal time and data misfortune (Keshta and Odeh, 2020). The EHR framework may also require significant hardware upgrades to meet the framework prerequisites. Another gamble distinguished by the SAFER Guides was the requirement for a hearty alternate course of action in case of framework failure or data misfortune (McGowan et al., 2022). The hospital may have to put resources into a backup and recuperation framework to guarantee that data isn’t lost in case of a disaster. E.g NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

The SAFER Guides also revealed that the new EHR framework could have to interface better with different frameworks utilized by the hospital, like the laboratory information framework or the pharmacy framework. This could lead to data consistency and blunders (Khubone et al., 2020). In addition, the Guides featured the requirement for a reliable patient identification framework to avoid patient data being assigned to some unacceptable record. The new EHR framework may require significant changes to the clinical work process at Allen Hospital, requiring staff training on new work processes and guaranteeing that the EHR framework moves along as planned with existing clinical work processes. Finally, the SAFER Guides distinguished the requirement for new communication channels between clinicians, staff, and patients, which ought to be reliable and get to avoid data breaches and communication mistakes (Das et al., 2020). These findings reveal that Allen Hospital needs to foster strong hardware and software strength, possibility planning, patient identification frameworks, and communication channels to help the effective implementation of the proposed EHR framework.

Utilizing the SAFER Guide to Find Areas of Chance and Improvements

Utilizing the SAFER Guides to evaluate the risks associated with carrying out an EHR framework at Allen Hospital was an edifying encounter. It assisted me with understanding the importance of recognizing potential risks and addressing them proactively to guarantee the progress of an informatics project. By distinguishing risks associated with executing an EHR framework at Allen Hospital, I zeroed in on fostering a gamble mitigation plan that addresses each recognized gamble.

This experience taught me the importance of working collaboratively with stakeholders and informed authorities to foster a thorough gamble mitigation plan. Distinguishing risks and fostering a mitigation plan requires input from various stakeholders, including IT staff, clinicians, and administrators, to guarantee all potential risks are recognized and adequately addressed (Bhagat et al., 2020). This experience will be useful in my future practice as a DNP nurturer, where I will be liable for leading large-scale informatics projects. I currently understand the importance of using SAFER Guides to distinguish potential risks associated with executing new technology in healthcare settings. I will utilize this experience to guide my future practice, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and proactive gamble management to execute informatics projects in healthcare settings effectively.

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

To put it plainly, the experience of utilizing SAFER Guides to find areas of hazard and center improvement endeavors has furnished me with valuable bits of knowledge and abilities that will be helpful in my future practice. I currently understand the importance of proactive gamble management and collaboration to execute informatics projects in healthcare settings effectively.


The SAFER Guides was an invaluable tool in recognizing potential risks and areas for development related to carrying out an Electronic Health Record framework at Allen Hospital. Utilizing the SAFER Guides, we better understood the hospital’s ongoing IT infrastructure, possibility planning, framework interfaces, patient identification, clinical work process, and communications (Dash et al., 2019). With this information, we can now foster a complete gamble mitigation plan that addresses these areas and guarantees the fruitful implementation of the EHR framework. As a DNP nurture, the experience of utilizing the SAFER Guides has been beneficial in preparing for future informatics/technology implementation projects and enhanced my understanding of the importance of chance assessment and mitigation in healthcare technology.


Adane, K., Gizachew, M., & Kendie, S. (2019). The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: A review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, Volume 12(12), 67–73. 

Aguirre, R. R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2019). Electronic health record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus, 11(9). 

Bhagat, S., Kapatkar, V. K., Mane, A., Pinto, C., Parikh, D., Mittal, G., & Jain, R. (2020). An industry perspective on risks and mitigation strategies associated with the post conduct phase of a clinical trial. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials, 15(1), 28–33. 

Das, S., Siroky, G. P., Lee, S., Mehta, D., & Suri, R. (2020). Cybersecurity: The need for data and patient safety with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm, 3(7). 

Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2019). Big data in healthcare: Management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1–25. 

Enticott, J., Johnson, A., & Teede, H. (2021). Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). 

Flaubert, J. L., Menestrel, S. L., Williams, D. R., & Wakefield, M. K. (2021). Educating nurses for the future. In National Academies Press (US). 

Huffstetler, A. N., Epling, J., & Krist, A. H. (2022). The need for electronic health records to support the delivery of behavioral health preventive services. JAMA, 5(3). 

Keshta, I., & Odeh, A. (2020). Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 22(2), 177–183. 

Khubone, T., Tlou, B., & Mashamba-Thompson, T. P. (2020). Electronic health information systems to improve disease diagnosis and management at point-of-care in low and middle-income countries: A narrative review. Diagnostics, 10(5), 327. 

McGowan, J., Wojahn, A., & Nicolini, J. R. (2022, February 10). Risk Management Event Evaluation and Responsibilities. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. 

Melnychuk, E., Sallade, T. D., & Kraus, C. K. (2022). Hospitals as disaster victims: Lessons not learned? Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, 3(1), e12632. 

Scantlebury, A., Sheard, L., Fedell, C., & Wright, J. (2021). What are the implications for patient safety and the experience of a major healthcare IT breakdown? A qualitative study. DIGITAL HEALTH, 7(3), 205520762110100. 

Szarfman, A., Levine, J. G., Tonning, J. M., Weichold, F., Bloom, J. C., Soreth, J. M., Geanacopoulos, M., Callahan, L., Spotnitz, M., Ryan, Q., Pease-Fye, M., Brownstein, J. S., Ed Hammond, W., Reich, C., & Altman, R. B. (2022). Recommendations for achieving interoperable and shareable medical data in the USA. Communications Medicine, 2(1). 

Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life, 10(12), 327. 


Struggling With Your Paper?
Get in Touch