NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

In NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage, technology and informatics integration are of great importance in enhancing the performance of patients’ care and operational proficiencies. This evaluation examines the possible consequences of Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems and TeleHealth technology utilized at a community hospital to provide quality healthcare to patients. With SAFER Guides, we not only figure out what technologies will provide the maximum benefit and thus become top-performing but also identify existing and possible risks that might come from these technologies (Kumar et al., 2019). The report aims to identify the main ways these technologies play the role of helpers in communication, shedding off the laborious workload and improving the quality and safety of patient care.

Defining Proposed Informatics to Implement as Part of Change Practice

While deploying a quality EHR system will be the main initiative to enhance the overall performance of the community hospital, the implementation and final integration of the suggested EHR package are already in progress (Aguirre et al., 2019). I have been receiving a lot of assistance from the hospital’s IT department. The chosen EHR system aims to make the present paperwork system more high-tech and digital. The operations will become faster and more convenient while reducing the human factor errors and, ultimately, boosting healthcare quality and safety.

Streamlining Workflows:

Among the key purposes of bringing the EHR system into this is to smooth out clinical operations within the health sector. The documentation process is one of the most time-consuming and error-prone factors that lead to wasteful use of the time consumed in one care service (Addis et al., 2023). The shift to an EHR system will allow healthcare professionals to enjoy a centralized platform. This is where they can document patient visits electronically, order tests and drugs in one place, and track their progress at their fingertips.

Enhancing Communication:

Integrating communication among healthcare providers is also a significant element in reaching a common target. Since records transcripts with paper-based systems can be a real barrier to sharing information among different departments and care teams, which sometimes takes a distorted acquisition (Heathway, 2024). Through the process of EHR digitization and incorporation of systems that allow for secure messaging and up-to-the-minute updates. The EHR system is designed to bring about smooth communication across all healthcare units so that everybody involved in patient care can relax in the thought that they are using information that was compiled at real-time.

Improving Patient Care Quality and Safety:

Mental health issues can often exacerbate these issues, leading to a cycle that can feel impossible to break out of. Many people have additional anxiety and depression due to their financial problems, creating a vicious cycle that perpetuates poverty (Knifton & Inglis, 2020). The objective of deploying an EHR facility is not merely mastery over-delivering healthcare services but also ensuring quality and safety in patient care. This eliminates the need to maintain paper records as healthcare providers can easily access patient electronic medical records across different organizations and departments (Tertulino et al., 2023). More informed clinical decisions, reduce the risk of medication errors, and enhance care coordination. Besides those elements, clinical decision support tools along the EHR system can also sound alarm bells for providers to know and identify potential risks or adverse effects even if the patient is in critical condition.

SAFER Guides’ Findings Regarding High-Performance Areas in MGH

Developing amazing products astounded clients and enabled them to achieve what they had envisioned for their enterprises. The SAFER Guides appraisal demonstrated that the option of the community medical center with the Telehealth program was spot on in line with the suggested solution, which is implementing a Telehealth platform.

Effective Communication and Information Flow:

 A significant result of the SAFER Guidelines is a well-articulated communication system and hospital information flow. The Telehealth platform is connected to the health organization’s existing Electronic Health Record (EHR) system (Zhang & Saltman, 2021). This linkage enhances productivity and eases medical workers’ access to patient data. For instance, doctors could review the current medical updates virtually as they could view patient historical data, lab results, and medication lists within the Telehealth interface. This provision would enable more informed virtual consultations and clinical judgments.

Patient Safety Protocols:

 SAFER Guides’ success is complemented by the hospital’s commitment to following all patient safety protocols as laid out therein in the context of the Usage of Video Telemedicine. The hospital has a well-regulated system for privacy and confidentiality during virtual visit protection (Paul et al., 2023). As an illustration, professional identification is needed, and patient consent is mandatory for telemedicine consultations. Hiring healthcare professionals who excel in virtual clinic techniques and training for data security best practices are some steps the hospital takes to match its healthcare service standards and protect patients’ information (Lampickienė & Davoody, 2022).

User Training and Support:

 The evaluation form of the SAFER Guides, likewise, praised the hospital’s implementation of a systematic approach to user enrollment and support while integrating Telehealth into its activities. Staff is given extensive training on how to operate the Telehealth platform through the strategy of using it efficiently, learning about technical aspects such as navigating the software interface and resolving common issues (Haleem et al., 2021). The health center provides training and help to insurance companies and other healthcare providers as they assimilate their confidence and become competent in Telehealth to deliver patient care.

SAFER Guides’ Findings Regarding Risk Areas in MGH

In the SAFER Guide evaluation of the set medical Telehealth implementation in a local hospital environment, many risks have been revealed, necessitating timely elimination and risk mitigation.

One of the crucial risks the SAFER Guides has highlighted is the possible data security breaches that occur using Telehealth. Even though the hospital has mitigated patient privacy and confidentiality during telehealth sessions by strengthening cybersecurity through network security lands, cyber-security, and insider threats play a role (Abdullah Alanazi, 2023). In addition, security issues were identified, including insecure encryption protocols and access controls to patient information, which can lead to data breaches and unauthorized access. With ensured safeguards not in place, the hospital risks having personal ID data stolen and sensitive health information released.

NURS FPX 8012 Assessment 3 SAFER Guides and Evaluating Technology Usage

One of the risks the SAFER Guides present is the insufficiency of the healthcare delivery organization’s current technology systems in accommodating Telehealth at scale. Regarding the hospital’s intentions to implement telehealth strategies, it was identified that the recurrent problem of restricted bandwidth and connectivity was a source of concern during the survey process (Breton et al., 2021). For example, emerging regions in the clinic’s rural areas may need more telemedicine connectivity, complicating virtual care services. Obsolete hardware systems and old versions of software programs might be images, interrupting Telehealth’s smooth integration into existing processes.

The findings of the SAFER Guide highlighted the challenges that may prevent providers, caregivers, and their patients from utilizing telehealth technology for remote care. The hesitancy of healthcare providers to change, plus the fact that patients are inclined to preserve face-to-face visits, is the cause of the lack of widespread pandemics of Telehealth technologies (Altinisik Ergur et al., 2022). For instance, healthcare providers faced the high possibility of losing personal connections with their patients during virtual consultations, which indicated that it was one of the factors they considered in deciding whether the virtual method was better as a care delivery mode. Telehealth platforms might also be a problem for seniors or inexperienced technological consumers; they need help adapting to the telehealth platform, which would exclude them from all the virtual care options (Gajarawala & Pelkowski, 2021).

Reflect on the Use of SAFER Guides for Risk Evaluation

Applying the SAFER Guides to evaluate the risks and areas that need improvement concerning engagements of telehealth technology within a community hospital has been an amazing learning process. It helped to put it into place to evaluate the ready to work of a given technology and what possible weaknesses could be possible. The procedure enabled me to learn in-depth about the intricate mechanisms behind the association of technology, organizational processes, and patiently associated outcomes.

It will significantly influence my departmental practice of technology implementation regarding personal projects. A precise risk evaluation and working with identified items of concern do not seem like extra things that take time but are something that makes processes safer, easier, and more valuable. By implementing all of SAFER Guides’ processes into my workflows, I intend to develop a balanced combination of technology innovations and safety measures to satisfy treatment quality and security needs. This immersion has put into perspective why evidence is a crucial element of providing quality care and why using management approaches to target improvement is key to achieving healthcare targets.


Using SAFER Guidelines, we understand the pros and cons of introducing healthcare applications in our community hospital. While they are good at identifying to what extent the medical data is secure and which technological infrastructure limitations prevent a successful outcome, they also uncover the downsides of a medical protocol, such as ineffective communication and lack of patient safety. As a result, these results would be used next as one the most important elements of our strategy to spot weaknesses and improve the efficiency of technology usage in achieving the healthcare goals set.


Abdullah Alanazi. (2023). Clinicians’ perspectives on healthcare cybersecurity and cyber threats. Cureus, 15(10).

Addis, B. A., Gelaw, Y. M., Eyowas, F. A., Bogale, T. W., Aynalem, Z. B., & Guadie, H. A. (2023). “Time wasted by health professionals is time not invested in patients”: Time management practice and associated factors among health professionals at public hospitals in bahir dar, ethiopia: A multicenter mixed method study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11(11), 1159275.

Aguirre, R. R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2019). Electronic health record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus, 11(9).

Altinisik Ergur, G., Nuhoglu, S., Cobanoglu, C., Sengul, M., Eryildiz, N., & Ergur, A. (2022). The patient perspective of telemedicine in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 42(1-2), 39–53.

Breton, M., Sullivan, E. E., Deville-Stoetzel, N., McKinstry, D., DePuccio, M., Sriharan, A., Deslauriers, V., Dong, A., & McAlearney, A. S. (2021). Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in quebec and massachusetts. BMC Family Practice, 22(1).

Gajarawala, S., & Pelkowski, J. (2021). Telehealth benefits and barriers. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 17(2), 218–221.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2(2).

Heathway, J. (2024). UvA-DARE (digital academic repository).

Knifton, L., & Inglis, G. (2020). Poverty and mental health: Policy, practice and research implications. BJPsych Bulletin, 44(5), 193–196.

Kumar, S., Tiwari, P., & Zymbler, M. (2019). Internet of things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: A review. Journal of Big Data, 6(1). springeropen.

Lampickienė, I., & Davoody, N. (2022). Healthcare professionals’ experience of performing digital care visits—a scoping review. Life, 12(6), 913.

Paul, M., Maglaras, L., Ferrag, M. A., & Almomani, I. (2023). Digitization of healthcare sector: A study on privacy and security concerns. ICT Express, 9(4), 571–588.

Tertulino, R., Antunes, N., & Morais, H. (2023). Privacy in electronic health records: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Public Health, 1(1).

Zhang, X., & Saltman, R. (2021). Impact of electronic health records interoperability on telehealth service outcomes (preprint). JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(1), e31837.

Leave a Reply