NSG 532 Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

NSG 532 Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development


There’s an impending deficit of nursers and the demand for nursing will continue to increase. As further scholars begin to apply to nursing programs, there will be a large volume of nursers who’ll continue with nanny preceptor places. The combination of neophyte nursers in addition to educated preceptors, they will need to combat obstacles faced with class development to help maintain pupil retention and pupil race rates. 

The ideal is to develop a class that will engage scholars, allure stakeholders to fete the continue changes that are demanded and apply them in program evaluation. The collaboration of stakeholders will help foster continuing changes within the class to keep with the norms of nursing. nanny Educator’s places and liabilities in Curriculum Development

As a nanny preceptor, they give the figure, fundamentals, and responsiveness to course accoutrements. They’re responsible for designing a class that’s doable, grueling, but aiding scholars to be nanny numbers upon entering their careers. preceptors are reckoned upon to solicit stakeholders ’ feedback for creating and revising class to detector what variations need to be applied to the course. A stakeholder can be linked as an individual, association, or group that inclusively agrees on a situation to either grease or enjoin a strategic decision (Belia teal., 2020). 

NSG 532 Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

In health care education, there are both internal and external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders include program faculty and scholars. External stakeholders include professional associations, health care institutions, alumni, and customer. Effective stakeholder engagement also offers benefits to consumers, scholars, faculty, and the nursing profession. Stakeholders play a critical part in icing classes focus on knowledge and skill development that adequately prepare nursers to perform adeptly in a dynamic health care terrain (D’Antoni teal., 2013). 

A nanny preceptor requests feedback from both scholars and association keyholders like the association or fellow alumni to help with the development of outdated course material and the integration of new course material. In order to grease new material and ideas to ameliorate class development, a cooperative trouble is demanded to make changes.

Internal and External Subject Matter Experts in the Curriculum Development (2019). External facilitators can Internal and external subjects matter experts (SME) give the feedback essential to advance class development as they’re suitable to give sapience on history and current programs. Internal SMEs help learning professionals develop training programs because they tend to work internally within an association (Huizinga teal., 2019) offer new perceptivity about the design process and the reform, help the schoolteacher design brigades to conduct design- related conditioning and help to foster reflection conditioning (Huizinga teal., 2019). 

NSG 532 Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

It’s precious to incorporate feedback in the morning of each class development and after, to give feedback and manage changes. nanny preceptors would profit from the use and perpetration of both internal and external feedback, as it helps enhance class development.

Faculty members’ places and liabilities 

In class development nanny preceptors are linked as faculty members as they help with the facilitation of class development. Faculty members’ places and liabilities include furnishing sapience from particular experience encounters with scholars and course material. Material is suitable to be presented through the knowledge and experience preceptors and faculty members have in order to prepare scholars. Accrediting agencies similar as the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (2014) and the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (2014) norms criteria include the educational medication and qualifications for nursing faculty. As part of their part, faculty members should be familiar with these prospects and assure that they meet the qualifications and prospects for the part of faculty (Keating teal., 2017). Faculty members can apply history and current information from classes and modify course material for the coming registration of scholars. NSG 532 Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

Feedback in the perpetration, Evaluation, and modification of Curriculum

After conducting a course, faculty is suitable to apply, estimate, and incorporate variations that are demanded to change class plans. All faculty members should be completely familiar with the total class specifically, its charge, gospel, organizational frame, pupil literacy issues, and plan of study (Keating etal., 2017). 

Faculty feedback allows for variations after feting what areas in the class need to be modified to help with the association of the course and help with combating issues of material that’s confusing. That includes posted material that scholars may not be suitable to pierce due to broken links on the course point. objectification of faculty members during this process helps with meeting the norms of nursing. NSG 532 Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

Using Student Feedback in the Development and Revision of Curriculum

It’s important that every faculty member is suitable to fete the requirements of the scholars and incorporate what challenges that are faced within the course. Pupil feedback can be used to help restructure course information that wasn’t well entered by scholars. The way class material is appreciatively or negatively entered may be reflected in the overall grade average per assignment in the class.

It’s the responsibility of the directors and faculty in the academy of nursing to make in defective development conditioning to ensure the integrity of the class and the quality of instruction in its perpetration (Keating etal., 2017). Faculty will be suitable to see notice a shift in pupil engagement after feedback has been enforced by course happy abetting in pupil success and confidence to do well in the course. 

Piloting courses, and coffers used on courses, before enforcing class

Piloting a course previous to finishing a class plan provides a pathway for how the course will be presented. To reiterate, the value of pupil preference and faculty input coincide with the success of a new or reoccurring class. It’s easy to slip into a pattern of ad hoc class development with little attention to asked issues. To maximize the eventuality of any medical education enterprise, we present a methodical approach to developing and accessing classes (Schneiderhan, 2019). 

NSG 532  Week 3 Collaborating to Improve Curriculum Development

Upon piloting, stakeholders and class organizers can make variations after entering feedback from the airman course. In nursing, exploration is constantly evolving, to maintain the norms of an accredited council or university, current motifs information is important to apply into a class plan. Piloting along with class advancements will be an ongoing process, conducting way to follow the cycle will help during the development. This timeline will propose to apply multiple way geared to program race, including the necessary stakeholders, faculty, and scholars to insure all input is being valued.


The value of integrating the opinions of faculty, preceptors, and scholars should be considering in class development as they help convert stake holders to revise class. Internal and external experts’ involvement is helpful with the input of generalities that are employed within the association and externally, their input is considered in the evaluation process of class development. Piloting courses is salutary to identify weak subjects but can apply generalities that will develop a strong class.


Belia, E., Carter, N., & Bryant-Lukosius, D. (2020). Stakeholder Engagement in Nursing Curriculum Development and Renewal Initiatives: A Review of the Literature. Quality Advancement in Nursing Education-Avancées en formation infirmary, 6(1), 2.

D’Antonio, P. O. B., Brennan, A. M. W., & Curley, M. A. (2013). Judgment, inquiry, engagement, voice: revisioning an undergraduate nursing curriculum using a shared decision-making model. Journal of Professional Nursing29(6), 407-413.

Huizinga, T., Nieveen, N., & Handelzalts, A. (2019). Identifying Needs for Support to Enhance Teachers’ Curriculum Design Expertise. In Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning (pp. 115-137). Springer, Cham.

Keating, S. B., & DeBoor, S. S. (Eds.). (2017). Curriculum development and evaluation in nursing education. Springer Publishing Company.

Schneiderhan, J., Guetterman, T. C., & Dobson, M. L. (2019). Curriculum development: a how to 

primer. Family medicine and community health7(2), e000046. 


Struggling With Your Paper?
Get in Touch