NRP 563 Assessment 1 Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

NRP 563 Assessment 1 Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

You’re seeing a 35- time-old woman who’s establishing care in your practice. This case is accompanied by her mate, who insists on being present during the interview. The woman doesn’t state any expostulations to her mate being present, although her mate does utmost of the talking. Your case appears slightly withdrawn and is reluctant to answer any questions regarding her home terrain. When you perform your test on the case, you notice multiple areas of bruising on her arms and legs. The patient countries that she’s clumsy and had a recent fall. 

Explain how you should do with this case grounded on the USPSTF recommendations on webbing for IPV. 

Cases aren’t likely to reports IPV when their mate or someone differently has accompanied them to their office visit. Wireworks should be done with the case separated from their mate (Ramaswamy et al, 2019). Every provider should apply 11 time with every case so the case can be completely assessed. 

I would ask the case’s mate to step out of the room. However, I would try and figure out a way to get the case out of the room to solicit her without the mate present similar as having her go to the restroom to collect a urine sample, If the mate refused. NRP 563 Assessment 1 Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

Describe which type of webbing tool you would use to screen for IPV grounded on the compliances handed in the script. 

 o I would use the HARK webbing tool. HARK stands for Demotion, hysterical, force, and Kick. The HARK webbing tool is the only webbing tool for IPV that defenses for all areas of mate abuse. The benefit of this tool is it’s only 4 questions, it’s a tone- reported webbing tool, and the questions can be answered in a simple “ yes ” or “ no ” response( Carver, 2018). 

 Determine which services you should give or relate her to for support. 

 I would incontinently offer intervention for this case by asking her if she’d like help leaving her current situation. However, I would give a safe place for her in the clinic and call the extremity platoon to help in getting the case to a women’s sanctum, if she requested help.

NRP 563 Assessment 1 Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

However, also I would give her with a phone number to the Victim’s Abuse Hotline for Ventura County, If the case refused intervention. She’d also be given the number to the original women’s harbors and associations which help women in vituperative connections. Ventura County also offers free legal counsel and court advocacy for victims of abuse (California Lutheran University, 2022). 

Estimate whether the situation described in the script clearances a formal report within your state and explain your findings. The healthcare provider in the state of California is needed by law to reports any given or nicely suspected domestic violence physical abuse. This is only needed of medical professionals who have handed care of a case with physical conditions. 

NRP 563 Assessment 1 Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

Medical professionals are subject to felonious discipline for not reporting the abuse. Also, Civil law requires that the provider alert the case if an obligatory report will be transferred out so the victim can make plans to avoid their abuser if they sweat further violence. Since this case had egregious bruising, which was inconsistent with injuries sustained in a fall, the provider would be needed to report the suspected abuse (California Department of Public Health, 2020).


California Department of Public Health. (2020). Domestic Violence Prevention. olencePrevention.aspx

CaliforniaLutheran University. (2022). Victims of Violence and Trauma.

Carver, J. (2018). Recommendations for intimate partner violence screening and interventions.

Ramaswamy, R., Ranji, R., & Salganicoff, A. (2019). Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Screening and Counseling Services in Clinical Setting.

Struggling With Your Paper?
Get in Touch