HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

All medical services associations should deal with the medical services dollars they get to really focus on patients and deal with the expense of running the association. A policy for controlling costs that have been used by healthcare organizations all over the world is summarized below. HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

Policies to prevent falls have been put in place for the obvious reason that, when a patient goes to the hospital and has to stay longer because of a problem like a fall, it costs more money for the patient, their insurance company, the health care organization, and ultimately taxpayers.

Fall Safeguards/Avoidance Arrangements

As indicated by Spetz et al. ( 2015), fall safety measures and anticipation approaches started to be executed when the Communities for Government health care and Medicaid Administrations (CMS) halted repayment for falls with injuries that were happening in the clinic after 2008. HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

The CMS was quickly followed by some private insurers. Hospitals lost millions of dollars as a result of patients falling while they were in the hospital, necessitating longer stays in the hospital and possibly additional surgeries and/or procedures. These strategies were carried out in all persistent consideration regions.

Fall counteraction programs included medical attendants evaluating their patients and creating care plans. Then the attendants needed to include the staff that really focused on the patients and affirmed they were following the fall anticipation care plan. 

Spetz et al. ( The majority of hospitals saw some cost savings that could be associated with the fall prevention programs, despite the fact that some hospitals did not see a reduction in their fall rates after investing in fall prevention programs (2015).

HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

Gürler & Bayraktar (2021) discuss the fact that falls are a major public health issue with negative health and economic effects. Fall prevention policies and their impact on fiscal aspects They summarized that studies have demonstrated that the majority of falls can be avoided and that implementing a fall prevention program has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing falls, thereby lowering healthcare costs. Burns et al.’s research study ( 2016), found that in 2012. 

The medical costs associated with non-fatal fall-related injuries were $30.3 billion, while those associated with fatal falls totaled $616.5 million. In 2015, it reached $31.3 billion and $637.5 million, respectively. Having a fall prevention program and ensuring that staff members use it can ultimately save the hospital millions of dollars, despite the high costs to the healthcare organization.

Policies for Fall Prevention and Quality of Care

Fall prevention programs may not provide a hospital with the expected financial “return on investment” if the hospital does not have a high rate of falls. However, as stated by Spetz et al. 2015), a medical care association ought to decide to start a fall counteraction program since it safeguards the patient and the emergency clinic’s standing.

When a patient is assessed on admission to determine whether they are at risk for falling and when the staff notifies other staff members that the patient has a high fall risk score, these patients receive better care than patients in hospitals that do not have a fall prevention policy. A facility can select from a variety of fall protection programs, some of which may require more time from nurses than others. HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

Due to the increased time required for assessment and documentation, more complex fall prevention policies may result in decreased efficiency for nurses; however, as nurses become more accustomed to the policy, efficiency increases.

Consequences Unexpected?

A hospital can use either a straightforward assessment checklist for staff members to use when evaluating patients or more sophisticated assessment tools made possible by cutting-edge technology, as was previously discussed. 

Oh-Park and others 2021) have distinguished new innovations that could incorporate wearable sensors, a bed exit caution framework, or infrared warm cameras which permit staff to notice the patient while they are in the medical clinic.

The potential for technology to be used may be considered an unintended consequence of the technology’s higher cost, but these tools can ultimately help the healthcare organization cut costs while also improving the patient’s quality of life and the care they receive in the hospital. HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

All hospitals must implement fall prevention policies in their organizations, whether they use cutting-edge technology or just a simple assessment checklist. Hospitals must cover the costs of caring for sick patients as the cost of healthcare rises. Adding a fall to a hospital stay can be devastating for the patient, their family, and the hospital itself.

Florence and Others 2018), noticed that due to the expansion in the maturing of the populace, the quantity of falls and the expenses of treating those wounds is supposed to increment impressively before very long. All healthcare facilities must have a fall prevention policy that is well-received by nurses and followed by staff.

Conclusion

There are many elements expected to assess the qualities and shortcomings of fall counteraction strategies however not having a fall counteraction program in a medical clinic is guileless. It has been found through extensive research that having strategies for prevention can significantly reduce hospital spending on health care. HSN 476 Assignment 3 Cost Control Policy

Florence et al. claim that ( 2018), 10,000 Americans turn 65 each day, and people over 85 make up the fastest-growing age group. This gathering is the most noteworthy gamble for falls accordingly the monetary weight connected with falls will increment later on.

Reference

Burns, E. R., Stevens, J. A., & Lee, R. (2016). The direct costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults – United States. Journal of safety research, 58, 99–103.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2016.05.001

Florence, C. S., Bergen, G., Atherly, A., Burns, E., Stevens, J., & Drake, C. (2018). Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(4), 693–698.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15304

Gürler, H., & Bayraktar, N. (2021). The effectiveness of a recurrent fall prevention program applied to elderly people undergoing fracture treatment. International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing, 40, 100820.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100820

Oh-Park, M., Doan, T., Dohle, C., Vermiglio-Kohn, V., & Abdou, A. (2021). Technology utilization in fall prevention. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation100(1), 92–99.

https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001554

Spetz, J., Brown, D. S., & Aydin, C. (2015). The Economics of preventing hospital falls. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(1), 50–57.

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edb&AN=100166861&site=eds-live&scope=site

 

Struggling With Your Paper?
Get in Touch